“This is the greatest and best band in the world’s. . . tribute.”
- Tenacious D (rephrased)
My bandmate (I don’t want to say ex- because I’d like to think I’m still part of the band) from a group from back home, Musings of a Cigarette-Smoking Man (MoaCSM), just posted photos of the old ensemble from years ago in his blog. It is sort of a coincidence that just recently I have been thinking about the bands I have been in, which especially involves the aforementioned. Seeing the pictures brought a nostalgia too powerful to just keep to myself – hence this post, to keep the memory intact.
I have been involved in many bands in the many years that I have been playing music, and I mean more than a handful. I have played with lots of musicians of great skill, with people whose music have touched the very depths of my personality, with bands that just give off a wonderfully exuberant dynamic that would (most of the time) catch on with the audience, driving them wild (er, sort of). But among all the possible interation-combinations of the above, MoaCSM is my most. favorite. band. Ever.
Sure, we’ve had our share of fun and unforgettable gigs (e.g. glam rock and 80’s night at Big Sky Mind), eureka! moments in song arrangements, and all that bliss that comes from being in a band. But these music-related ups are merely nice details why I love these bunch of wackos so much. The big simple deal is this: as different as what we do are, each of the four of us are ultimately alike. We are geeks who, among the large demographic, like the same kinds of things.
Or most importantly, we like talking about the same kinds of things.
It is logical to think of the probability distribution of conversation topics occuring with respect to the number of persons (“collective minds”) involved in discussion. That is, as more people enter into the conversation, the lower any group of subjects are likely to be discussed, and even so, each would be talked about at a shorter duration, surviving only until such time as at least one person decides to move on to a different one. Now, if more people have some common interests, then the probability of discussions encompassing such interests would be higher. However, if the group itself was formed precisely due to those interests – say, musicians hanging out after a gig – then it just follows that the probability of anything music-related being discussed will be almost equal to 1. It is now more accurate to think not a probability distribution, but a Venn diagram.
Bear with me here! So, four musicians belonging to one band have conversations within a circle consisting of others (musicians from other bands, friends, gig audience, etc.) It is totally predictable to talk music, or even some other art-related things. But to take away the others, leaving only the foursome, and have them talk about things entirely different from music, but talk about them as if they were as common to them as music? The odds are quite low, indeed. In this case, the Venn diagram has the circles converging so tightly as to almost form only a single entity.
This is MoaCSM.
We have not discovered this phenomenon until later on in the band’s life, on the night we first got together – over alcohol, of course – with nobody else but the four of us. (It was in my house, for the record.) It started with comic books, anime, film, and we always come back to those. But at some point subjects became more and more ambitious, reaching to a point where I could say they were intellectual discussions. We were not anymore just talking about good works in media and literature, but the philosophies, principles and science – most of all the science! – behind these works. And that’s not just it: soon we would ponder over theories we could barely grasp. We dealt with the macrocosmos (the universe) and the microcosmos (the mind), then things about our lives, then everyone’s lives… we have turned ourselves into existentialists, philosophers, mathematicians, theologists.
It is of course pretentious to claim that we achieved the degree of complexity that actual mathematicians, philosophers, existentialists, etc. tackle in regularity. We were only go so far as our own small intellects could. But we all went there together, at the same level, and for that one night we were thinkers of the world, scholars that would figure everything out for the benefit of the human race.
And that went on with each and every night the band got together, huddled alone in a quiet dining room, unlocking the secrets to Life, the Universe and Everything. For all intents and purposes, it has become tradition.
I miss those times.
***
Err, as I spent too much time writing about the band, I now make haste to announce that I have moved to my more permanent place. It is in Po Lam, right in the heart of… nothingness. It is a suburb of Hong Kong (or at least as close as you could define “suburb”), there at the far east of Kowloon. If you look at the MTR map, I am five minutes walk away from the very last station at the rightmost.
I actually like it here. It’s a 15-minute bus ride to school, and there is a huge mall that has everything I need – even equipped with a cinema! – about a block away. My flatmate, whom I am renting my room under, is a nice guy who likes things clean. The overall flat is big, around 600 sq. ft., and has a Yamaha Electone organ and a Clavinova, the latter of which I love the piano sound a lot.